The Orchard Lane Review

Reporting for the week the bill arrives.

No adverts, no favours
Business

Who Packed the Box Decides Who Pays, and Four Other Checks Before a Shipment Moves

Packing labor, liability formulas and claim deadlines are priced differently on either side of a border, and the differences decide who absorbs a broken shipment.

Eleanor Whitcombe·5 min read·1,191 words

A moving crew's inventory sheet on a clipboard resting on a stack of sealed cardboard cartons, with a wooden crate stamped for export standing beside an open...
A moving crew's inventory sheet on a clipboard resting on a stack of sealed cardboard cartons, with a wooden crate stamped for export standing beside an open...

A shipment that arrives broken produces two separate arguments, and they are rarely held at the same time. The first is about the damage itself, which is usually visible and rarely disputed. The second is about who absorbs it, which turns on paperwork signed weeks earlier, often by someone who read the estimate line and skipped everything underneath it. What follows are the five places that second argument gets settled, priced as they actually appear on an invoice, and compared against how the same job is handled once a shipment crosses a border and falls under a different rulebook.

1. Whether the carrier packed it, or you did

Almost every domestic moving and freight contract in the United States distinguishes between cartons packed by the carrier and cartons packed by the owner, abbreviated PBO on the inventory sheet, and that abbreviation is the single most consequential mark on the document. A carton the crew packed is a carton the carrier stands behind for its contents. A carton you packed is, in most standard terms, covered only if the box itself shows external damage, which means a cracked plate inside an intact box is your loss. Full packing service typically runs as a separate labor line, charged by the hour or by the carton, and it buys liability as much as it buys convenience.

European removal firms operating under national trade association terms tend to draw the same line, but they draw it earlier and more visibly, often refusing to load owner-packed cartons of fragile goods at all rather than loading them with an exclusion attached. That refusal is sometimes read as inflexibility. It is closer to the opposite: the firm is declining to carry an item on terms where the customer would discover the exclusion only after the damage. The practical lesson for a US shipper is that the cheaper choice, packing it yourself, is a decision about risk allocation, and it should be made deliberately for each category rather than as a blanket economy.

2. The liability figure is a weight formula, not a value

Interstate household goods carriers are required to offer a basic level of liability that is calculated per pound per article, and the resulting number bears no relationship to what the article cost. A forty pound television and forty pounds of towels settle identically. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration oversees interstate household goods transportation and the valuation choices carriers must present, and the alternative, usually called full value protection, is a priced product: you declare a total value for the shipment and pay a rate against that declared amount, with a deductible option that moves the rate up or down.

Cross-border, the same logic appears in treaty language. International air cargo settles under the Montreal Convention at a capped amount per kilogram expressed in Special Drawing Rights, road freight across most of Europe settles under the CMR convention at a lower per kilogram cap, and ocean cargo under Hague-Visby settles at whichever is greater of a per package figure or a per kilogram figure. Every one of these is a weight formula with a value ceiling bolted on, and every one of them can be raised by declaring value and paying for it. The declaration is the whole mechanism.

3. The deadline to file, which is shorter than it looks

Interstate household goods claims in the United States run on a filing window measured in months from delivery, which sounds generous until you account for the unpacking that never happens, the boxes that sit in a garage through a season, and the crate opened in March that was delivered in October. Freight and parcel claims run shorter, sometimes measured in days for concealed damage, and the clock starts at delivery rather than at discovery. The delivery receipt is where the record begins, and a notation of visible damage on that receipt changes the shape of every conversation afterward.

The international conventions are stricter still and admirably specific about it. CMR road carriage requires written notice of concealed damage within a fixed count of days from delivery, and Montreal Convention air cargo sets a similarly tight written notice period, after which the shipment is presumed to have arrived in good condition. What this produces, in practice, is a European logistics culture where the receiving party inspects and annotates at the dock as a matter of routine rather than as an accusation. Adopting that habit domestically costs nothing and preserves everything.

4. Which government actually writes the rules for your route

A move that crosses a state line and a move that stays inside one are governed by different authorities, and the difference reaches the price. Interstate moves follow federal requirements on estimates, inventories and valuation disclosure. A move entirely within a state follows that state's own regime, and those regimes vary considerably: some states require licensing and published tariffs with binding estimate rules, others regulate household goods movers lightly, and the consumer protections a shipper assumes are universal may simply not attach to a purely local job.

The comparison abroad is instructive because the variation runs the other way. In Germany and the Netherlands, removal work is largely governed by national commercial code provisions and industry standard terms that apply whether the van travels ten miles or four hundred, so the customer sees one set of rules regardless of distance. A US shipper gets a better outcome by asking a plain question before signing: which authority's rules apply to this particular route, and does the estimate on the table become binding under them.

5. What the packing materials and access conditions add

The materials bill is rarely the surprise. The access bill is. Custom wood crating for artwork, stone or glass is priced per crate and reflects real carpentry, and it is the one expense that reliably prevents the loss it is bought against. Around it sit charges that have nothing to do with fragility: long carries measured from the truck to the door, stair carries by flight, shuttle service when a tractor trailer cannot reach the address, and elevator reservation windows in buildings that grant them by the hour.

International adds a layer that catches first-time exporters. Solid wood packing material moving between most countries must be heat treated and stamped under the ISPM 15 phytosanitary standard, and an unmarked pallet or crate can be held, treated or destroyed at the border at the shipper's cost. Customs inspection may require a crate to be opened and repacked, and the repack is billable. Quote these conditions at the outset, because a crate built correctly the first time travels through the inspection instead of stopping at it.

The pattern across all five is that the expensive decisions are made before anything is loaded, in language that reads as boilerplate and functions as an allocation of loss. A shipper who marks the inventory honestly, declares a value and pays the rate against it, annotates the delivery receipt at the dock, confirms which authority governs the route, and crates to the destination's standard has bought a shipment where the second argument, the one about who pays, is already answered.

Elsewhere in this notebook